Recently in Strategy Category
May 27, 2015
January 13, 2015
January 29, 2014
September 3, 2011
On the trip they will meet with community members, leaders and various organizations.
Team members include:
Vicki May, Professor, Thayer School of Engineering
Vicki May is an Instructional Associate Professor of Engineering at Dartmouth's Thayer School of Engineering and she is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of New Hampshire and California. At Thayer School, Vicki teaches solid mechanics, integrated design, and structural analysis. Prior to joining the faculty at Thayer, she was a professor of Architectural Engineering at Cal Poly State University in San Luis Obispo. She also worked in the Los Angeles area for a firm that specializes in seismic rehabilitation of historic structures. She earned her BS in civil engineering from the University of Minnesota and her MS and PhD degrees in structural engineering from Stanford University.
Jack Wilson, Professor, Studio Art
Jack Wilson is an architect and planner and is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Studio Art at Dartmouth College where he teaches courses in Drawing, Architectural Design and Landscape Art & Design. He also teaches a course on Integrated Design at Dartmouth's Thayer School of Engineering. Until 2009 he was responsible for supervision of campus planning as well as project development, architect selection and design review for large scale capital projects at Dartmouth. In addition to teaching he currently also consults on the planning, design and construction of health care, institutional, commercial and residential projects. Prior to coming to northern New England Jack worked for a number of architectural firms in Philadelphia PA. Jack earned his AB in Art at Vassar College and his Master of Architecture degree at the University of Pennsylvania. He has given invited talks, and presented papers nationally and internationally and is active both at Dartmouth and locally on numerous committees and boards, including the Board of Directors of The Family Place, a non-profit organization in Vermont focused on building strong families in order to build strong communities.
Molly Bode, Global Health Program Officer, The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science
Molly Bode is a Global Health Program Officer at The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science. Molly also serves as the Dartmouth Haiti Response Coordinator for medical and educational initiatives with partners in Haiti. In addition to working on Haiti projects, she helps coordinate other global health activities at the College including projects in Rwanda, India, other countries, and in the US. Prior to her current position, Molly served in a two-year fellowship in the President's Office and The Dartmouth Center working on projects for President Jim Yong Kim. She graduated from Dartmouth College in 2009 with a Biology and Film major and is currently taking Masters in Public Health courses.
Tyler Pavlowich, PhD student, Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
Tyler is a second-year PhD student in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology program at Dartmouth College. He has worked with fish and aquaculture for seven years, both as a researcher and extensionist to rural communities in Paraguay as a Peace Corps volunteer.
His most recent research has focused on the use of algae as a feed source for tilapia in integrated food-energy systems with Professor Anne Kapuscinski from the Environmental Studies Program. He is starting his dissertation and interested in how appropriate aquatic food production systems can contribute to ecological and human well-being.
Special thanks to Dartmouth for making this happen!
June 15, 2011
What began as a challenge in a blog post on the Harvard Business Review website has resulted in a collection of 300 design submissions from around the world. The $300 House Open Design Challenge is complete, with judges picking their final selections after much deliberation, and an extension, in order to go through the entries in detail.
Winners were selected in combination with votes from the community and a panel of judges comprised of expert designers, architects, and thought leaders. The winners share $25000 in total prize money which includes $10,000 in cash awards to the top 16 placements as voted by the community itself, and $15,000 in scholarships to attend a prototyping workshop for six participants (three selected by the community, and three by the judges panel).
The winners of the prototyping workshop scholarship are
(listed by username):
"We're delighted by the depth and breadth of the submissions we received," says Vijay Govindarajan, Professor of International Business and the Founding Director of Tuck's Center for Global Leadership. "Hosting this contest on Jovoto's open, co-creation platform gave us a wealth of ideas and identified the people who we believe have the passion, skill, and commitment, to take the project to the next level, prototyping and actually building a $300 house for the poor. We invite all the participants to continue the discussion at www.300house.com."
May 27, 2011
Special thanks to the Jovoto team - Nathalie, Nadine, Peter (x2), Bastian, and Shaun at Mutopo for making this happen - without your generosity we'd never have gotten off the ground. Thanks also to Scott Tew from Ingersoll Rand for your willingness to try this experiment.
Now, let the judging begin!
April 20, 2011
April 9, 2011
The following questions were sent to VG and Christian by Shraya, a 4th grader in Miss Mancosh's class. Her mentor for this project is Miss Emily Pasquale. Thanks for your questions, Shraya!
March 10, 2011
VG explains the rationale behind the $300 House. Watch >>
February 26, 2011
Read all about the Urban Challenge on the Harvard Business Review blog>>
February 13, 2011
“The problem is that 90 percent of the world’s designers spend all their time working on solutions to the problems of the richest 10 percent of the world’s customers. A revolution in design is needed to reverse this silly ratio and reach the other 90 percent.”
Paul Polak in Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Approaches Fail
Here are Paul’s 12 steps to practical problem solving for the poor:
- Go to where the action is.
- Talk to the people who have the problem and listen to what they have to say.
- Learn everything you can about the problem’s specific context.
- Think big and act big.
- Think like a child.
- See and do the obvious.
- If somebody has already invented it, you don’t need to do so again.
- Make sure your approach has positive, measurable impacts that can be brought to scale.
- Design to specific cost and price targets.
- Follow practical three-year plans.
- Continue to learn from your customers.
- Stay positive: don’t be distracted by what other people think.
For all the designers out there, these principles should be applied to the design and implementation of the $300 House. Paul Polak’s approach at D-REV and IDE is the direction is which Design must go if is to make a difference in the world.
February 12, 2011
Even as we were trying to organize an Open Challenge for the $300 House, we received this submission from Javier Tenorio and Fernando Garcia-Landois of Owens Corning. Thanks guys! In addition to helping design a $300 House, your paper helps us set the standard format for the entire project!
The paper has six sections:
1. essential house areas definition
2. customer needs approach
3. design association for needs
4. a design proposal
5. proposed materials
6. costs and conclusions
Of particular interest to us are sections 2 and 3 - because they help us see the connections between customer needs and design:
Download the entire thing here >>
February 4, 2011
Bamboodist and architect David Sands blogs about the $300 House in Harvard Business Review:
"It's easy to say a $300 House for the poor should be designed a sustainable solution, but it's no easy feat. To be sustainable, all the elements must be good for the user, good for the environment and good for those who made them. Where do the materials come from? Of what are they composed? Are they nontoxic? Or better yet, are they biophilic: Is life on earth improved for everyone and all creatures because this product is being made? Also, if it is not affordable, it is not sustainable! With their reduced economic means, fewer choices are available to the poor and cost precludes many otherwise sustainable options."Read the entire post >>
January 21, 2011
Meet the Über Shelter, from $300 House advisor Rafael Smith:
January 8, 2011
Almost all urban areas of the world have slum dwellers, developed countries have slums and developing countries have slums. The common elements and operations of all such areas can be looked at from a systems science standpoint.
Essentially in any slum or slum equivalent boundary, each resident is an open subsystem exchanging resources with the larger system at its boundary. Each subsystem is driven to optimize its own resource exchange with the larger entity at its boundary with limited or no regard for other subsystems in the slum boundary. This dynamic leads to the creation of a perpetual slum. Once this dynamic is changed the slum can be transitioned to a sustainable perpetually improving community, with a developed infrastructure.
The question is then: Change the dynamics to what?
Link the open subsystems of the slum into goal oriented closed slum system which trades resources at the limited interfaces at the boundary with the larger system in an organized way to the benefit of the slum system
How to bring about the change?
- Map all the resource interchanges between the slum subsystems and the larger system. This can be done by collecting data of revenue flow into the slum area and revenue outflow from the slum area.
- Diverting a large part of the revenue flow going out of the slum area to circulate inside the slum area by setting up services needed by the subsystem by the residents of the system ( example if residents are getting al their food supplies outside the system, set up a small food supply business inside the system run by a resident)
This needs input from social political scientists, the key is to organize as a self directed, sustainable entity with controlled interface with the outside system to move the equilibrium point to higher standard of living.
What physical infrastructure is needed?
Housing, potable water, sewer system, sanitation, toilets, electricity, medical care, education, communications. Prioritize the physical infrastructure needs and find creative way to generate these, for example if the infrastructure element is at the end of the value chain where its value has been exhausted by the larger system it can be recycled into the slum system.
An example of this end of life planned value chain:
If a dual purpose shipping container is developed which maximizes the space usage of trailers, the slum system can provide a service for picking up discarded containers for a fee and recycle them inside the slum system as building blocks for houses. The residents would actually build the houses.
The shipping containers could be developed and promoted by trucking companies for it would improve their hauling capacity utilization. This would also save wood and diminish landfill space needed for discarded wood crates.
Each of the other Physical infrastructure needs could also be filled by creative value chain ideas.
Finally, once a self contained community is created it can be relocated as a whole self contained community to a better geographical location if physical improvements or land title is not possible at the current location.
How do we begin?
Let's bring together three coordinated Grad School Teams to:
- Map the revenue flow of the slum & recommend changes for conservation of the value flow inside the slum
- Study the existing Social, political ecosystem and recommend changes to build a closed system with limited interfaces with the larger system
- Creative value chain ideas to provide physical infrastructure
I'm interested in hearing your feedback in the comments section below.
December 23, 2010
Wasn’t there a song about this?
December 5, 2010
In just a few sentences, Seth tells us just what it means to eke out a living at the bottom of the pyramid.
Triple the U.S. population by three. That's how many people around the world live on about a dollar a day. Triple it again and now you have the number that lives on $2. About forty percent of the world lives on $2 or less a day.
What's that like? It's almost impossible for most of us to imagine. I mean, $2 is the rent on your apartment for about 45 minutes. It buys you one bite of lunch at a local restaurant. And yet, two billion people survive on that sort of income.
Read the full post >>
November 28, 2010
Why $300? That’s a question that keeps coming up.
To answer this question, let’s look at what inspired the $300 house. It all started with this video of Partners In Health in action [disclosure: at the time I was putting together a project involving PIH, SELF and the reggae group Steel Pulse at www.holdon4haiti.org].
Watch Dr. David Walton’s story at the 4:24 mark >>
At 4:57 we see Dr. Walton visit a girl with a heart ailment. She lived, as you see, in a one room hut with 11 other family members. Her house is what started this $300 house idea rolling - first as a blog post, and now as a project to bring together the people and organizations to make it a reality.
So why $300? Three reasons:
1) the Tata Nano was built around the idea that a car should cost $2000/- They then engineered everything to fit that price point - which in turn forced a lot of innovative design thinking. So our point was that if we set a hard number like $300, well, then we’ll be forced to innovate to meet that number. We’re simply setting a target.
2) We then used an old formula which we used to use when I was a kid in India - anything that cost 100$ in the US, you could get re-engineered for 10$ in India. Following that logic, a $3000 shed available at Sam’s Warehouse should then cost $300 in an emerging country like India or perhaps even less in a poor country like Haiti.
3) Finally, we looked up the cost of what a poor person’s house is in a place like Bangladesh. From Yunus’ book - where he describes 10 attributes of people who have escaped poverty in Bangladesh - we found an estimate for $370 for a house of Grameen members who have escaped poverty.
So we set $300 as a target price; for a social business that should be doable.
Now, can we do it? Join us >>
November 27, 2010
The concept of the $300 House owes its genesis to the Harvard Business Review:
- The Challenge by Vijay Govindarajan and Christian Sarkar
- The Financial Challenge by David A. Smith
- The Design Challenge by Bill Gross
- The Energy Challenge by Bob Freling
- The Co-Creation Challenge by Gaurav Bhalla
- The Marketing Challenge by Seth Godin
- The Performance Challenge by Doug Smith
- The Corporate Challenge by Stephanie A. Burns
- The Sustainability Challenge by David Sands